Changes between Version 9 and Version 10 of WikiPages_Public/Digisonde to Final Review


Ignore:
Timestamp:
28 Sep 2020 14:31:20 (4 years ago)
Author:
abelehaki
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • WikiPages_Public/Digisonde to Final Review

    v9 v10  
    6161|| 1700 || End of the meeting || ||
    6262
    63 
    64 
    65 
    6663== Participants ==
    67 
    6864|| Name || Affiliation ||
    6965|| Andrej Rozkov   (AR) || EC (Project Officer) ||
    … …  
    8581|| Zama Katamzi-Joseph   (ZK) || SANSA ||
    8682|| Haris Haralambous   (HH) || FU ||
     83|| Joanna Rupiewicz (JR)  || ESSP ||
    8784
    88  
    89 
    90  
    9185== Minutes ==
    9286__Introduction__
    … …  
    110104VP asked if there was an evolution in the users’ classification. CB clarified that the users’ groups have been identified since the early stages of the project, i.e. EGNOS, NRTK, HD communications, HF geolocation, radio astronomers. However, within the course of the project different representatives from these groups have been approached and several of them attended the TechTIDE users’ workshops.
    111105
    112 __WP2 TID identification methodologies__ 
     106__WP2 TID identification methodologies__
    113107
    114108DA gave an overview talk on the work done in WP2, explaining how the methodologies have been improved and validated.
    … …  
    130124__WP5 Assessment of the impact on aerospace and ground systems__
    131125
    132 [ MJ gave an overview talk on the objectives and the methodology adopted
    133 to perform the work done in WP5. This general part was followed by a specific
    134 presentation on the impact on NRT systems (presented by MJ), on the impact on EGNOS
    135 (presented by SM) and on the impact on HF systems (presented by JT).]
     126[ MJ gave an overview talk on the objectives and the methodology adopted to perform the work done in WP5. This general part was followed by a specific presentation on the impact on NRT systems (presented by MJ), on the impact on EGNOS (presented by SM) and on the impact on HF systems (presented by JT).]
    136127
    137128VP asked about the reliability of the impact assessment and the possibility to issue false alarms. MJ explained that the reliability of the impact assessment relies on the network configuration and on the software used by the service provider and the user.
    … …  
    168159
    169160VP gave her concluding remarks: the work in TechTIDE was very professional. All the deliverables, which were numerous, were submitted on time. The project produced good science and new ideas emerged for new projects. The warning system is a useful tool for the users. The communication towards the public was good. There is a promising plan for the exploitation of the project results, including the maintenance of the web sites. The possibilities for commercialization through the ESA SSA give good prospects for the sustainability of the TechTIDE achievements.
    170 
    171